Cerca QUI

No methane, low methane, high methane – Mars has it all

The rover Curiosity has recorded a burst of methane that lasted at least two months, raising the possibility of life on Mars. Photo: NASA
– Life on Mars? Today? The notion may not be so far-fetched after all.
A year after reporting that NASA’s Curiosity rover had found no evidence of methane gas on Mars, all but dashing hopes that organisms might be living there now, scientists have reversed themselves.
Curiosity has now recorded a burst of methane that lasted at least two months.
For now, scientists have just two possible explanations for the methane. One is that it is the waste product of certain living microbes.
“It is one of the few hypotheses that we can propose that we must consider as we go forward,” said John P. Grotzinger, the mission’s project scientist.
The scientists also reported that for the first time, they had confirmed the presence of carbon-based organic molecules in a rock sample. The so-called organics are not direct signs of life, past or present, but they lend weight to the possibility that Mars had the ingredients required for life and may even still have them.
“This is really a great moment for the mission,” Grotzinger told a news conference here at the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union.
The presence of methane is significant because the gas cannot exist for long. Calculations indicate that sunlight and chemical reactions in the Martian atmosphere would break up the molecules within a few hundred years, so any methane there now must have been created recently.
It could have been created by a geological process known as serpentinization, which requires both heat and liquid water. Or it could be a product of life in the form of microbes known as methanogens, which release methane as a waste product.
Even if the explanation for the methane turns out to be geological, the hydrothermal systems would still be prime locations to search for signs of life.
Scientists have always expected that some tiny amount of methane would be found on Mars. Cosmic dust falling on the planet contains organic compounds that are broken up by ultraviolet light from the sun, producing methane.
But the new findings, described in detail in a paper this week in the journal Science, are a 180-degree flip from a year ago, when mission scientists said that Curiosity had found no signs of methane, placing an upper limit of 1.3 parts per billion by volume.
Since then, the scientists refined their measurements, detecting a background level of 0.7 parts per billion. That is half of what was predicted, raising another mystery that somehow methane is also being destroyed.
But in November 2013, two months after the scientists reported the absence of methane on Mars, the rover measured methane levels 10 times as high.
“It was an ‘oh, my gosh’ moment,” said Christopher Webster of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the lead author of the Science paper.
The methane level stayed high through at least the end of January.
It subsequently fell, to less than 1 part per billion.
An earlier measurement in July had also been high, although it dropped by half a week later, and the margin of error made it unclear what was going on. Curiosity made no methane measurements between July and November 2013.
Sushil Atreya of the University of Michigan, a member of the science team, said it was possible that elevated methane levels lasted from July through January. “It could have been over six months,” he said, “but we don’t know that.”
Given its quick appearance and quick disappearance, mission scientists suspect the newly discovered methane was a relatively small burst.

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento

Salve! Ogni lettore è invitato a commentare qualsiasi post voglia, ed è un bene il confronto d'idee. Sono dunque io, Riccardo Perilli, ad invitare ognuno di voi, carissimi lettori, a commentare i post che scrivo o condivido. Le uniche due cose che chiedo di rispettare, per chiunque commenti, è che mi scriva poi, in fondo al proprio commento, un nome (non importa il cognome, mi raccomando!) al quale possa far riferimento per rispondergli (altrimenti appare "Commento in anonimo"); e che poi clicchi sulla spunta "inviami notifiche", in modo da poter restare sempre aggiornato sulle risposte che fornirò, e quelle che scriveranno gli altri lettori.
Ringrazio, nel frattempo, in attesa di vostri nuovi commenti, chi già ha commentato e chi commenterà.

Per contattarmi

Alcuni testi o immagini inseriti in questo blog sono tratti da internet e, pertanto, considerate di pubblico dominio; qualora la loro pubblicazione violasse eventuali diritti d'autore,
vogliate comunicarmelo via email. Saranno immediatamente rimossi. L'autore del blog non è responsabile dei siti collegati tramite link né del loro contenuto che può essere soggetto
a variazioni nel tempo.